Oh, come on. She's thinking about what to feed her husband for dinner.😊

Oh, come on. She's wondering what to feed her husband for dinner.

Vera Ketova, your version is more interesting. I remember a joke from Yuri Nikulin: "Women, to keep a man, remember – you have to feed this beast well!"

Another banal, uninteresting photo of a titmouse (and a "soapy" one at that)

Another banal, uninteresting photo of a titmouse (and a "soapy" one at that)

M Y X O M O P, Well, of course... I knew you wouldn't ignore the photo. Thank you!

... Well, of course...

Vakhtang Bartaia, compare:

Well, so there's no such thing as "You criticize here, but you don't photograph birds yourself. You should try it, you'd see how difficult it is!"

Vakhtang Bartaia, compare:

M Y X O M O P, I've already compared. These are artists whose work I've long admired.

Well, so that there wouldn't be this "You criticize here, but you yourself don't take pictures of birds. You should try, you'd find out how difficult it is!"

M Y X O M O P, you shouldn't have posted your own, somewhat random, photo as a comparison.

... you shouldn't have posted yours as a comparison...

Sergey Kryshen, don't distort things – yours is NOT for comparison. It's all written there for what purpose (and in a separate, different comment, at that).

Sergey Kryshen, no need to distort – yours is NOT for comparison. It's all written there for what purpose (and in a separate, different comment, at that).

M Y X O M O P, The human subconscious is designed in such a way that your photo becomes the default object of comparison. And the link doesn't go to any photo in the comments, but to the key (title) photo. So I'm not distorting, I'm simply sharing my feelings.

... The human subconscious is designed so that your photo becomes the default object of comparison. And the link isn't to any photo in the comments, but to the key (title) photo...

Sergey Kryshen, I don't know how your subconscious works, but the purpose of including a link to my photo is stated in the comment with this link – to show that I also have a bird, which means I've photographed them and know how "difficult" it is. The goal is to show that I don't just have trash heaps like this one:


Now your subconscious will compare Vakhtang's tit to my trash heap?

Sergey Kryshen, I don't know how your subconscious works, but the purpose of including a link to my photo is stated in the comment with that link – to show that I also have a bird, which means I've photographed them and know how "difficult" it is. The goal is to show that I have more than just trash heaps, like this one:

Now will your subconscious compare Vakhtang's titmouse to my trash heap?

M Y X O M O P, no, it won't compare it to a trash heap. A trash heap completely falls out of the associative chain, and no comparisons are suggested. With your comment, you proved that you sometimes photograph birds, but there's also the concept of being able to photograph birds well...

... With your comment, you proved that you sometimes photograph birds, but there's also the concept of being able to photograph birds well...

Sergey Kryshen, you're r-r-r-r-r-r-r-r. And that's exactly why you initially gave four examples.

... I've already compared. These are the masters whose work I've long admired.

Vakhtang Bartaia, and your "recommendation" is only for one, at the moment.