Damn, I'm sorry, but I don't like this at all. This clumsy Photoshop blurring of the background, especially when you see the EXIF data. ))) Once again, I apologize; I rarely comment, but I decided to do so. I'm expecting a beating from the local regulars.)))
Damn, I'm sorry, but I don't like it at all. This clumsy Photoshop blurring of the background, especially when you see the EXIF data. ))) Once again, I apologize, I rarely write comments, but I decided to do so. I'm expecting a beating from the local regulars.)))
Andrey Ivanov, come on! The regulars gobble up worse treats! They even ask for seconds.
Pablo Ko., And true! The half-blind and sensation-hungry, i.e., utter kitsch, are everywhere.
Nikolay Semenov, Well, you're wrong – the author created a striking image (he's a professional, after all), many people liked it, and there's no accounting for taste. And the dome in the background would have been great too...
Nikolay Semenov, Well, you're wrong – the author created a spectacular image (he's a professional, after all), many people liked it, and there's no accounting for taste. A dome in the background would be great, too...
Boris Gurevich, and sprinkle some beans, cilantro, and nuts on the foreground.
Nikolay Semenov, Well, you're wrong – the author created a spectacular image (he's a professional, after all), many people liked it, and there's no accounting for taste. And if only there was a dome in the background...
Boris Gurevich, It seems he's a new rising star at Photocenters, a searching author who's not afraid of bold experiments. He has a couple of good portraits in his portfolio, but his technique is still weak.
Boris Gurevich, It seems he's a new rising star at Fototsentra, a proactive artist unafraid of bold experiments. He has a couple of good portraits in his portfolio, but his technique is still weak.
Viktor Kirillov, I agree, I was happy to recommend several portraits. This photo is from another viewer...
Viktor Kirillov, I agree, I was happy to recommend several portraits. This photo is from another viewer...
Boris Gurevich, but who else??? If it had deep meaning, a complex presentation, and a mile-long description of the work, then yes... But what about this???))) Everything is very CRUELLY done. Why are the sleds blurred??? They're in the same harness with the dogs and almost on the same plane as the dogs. They should also be in some focus, but no... They're also blurred, like the fence and the snow, but for some reason the people on the right are just wildly blurred. Nothing but inconsistencies and contradictions. How do you rate this work as professional? Because there's "PRO" next to the author's nickname???
Boris Gurevich, what other image??? If it had deep meaning, a complex presentation, and a mile-long description of the work, then yes... But what's this???))) Everything is very CRUSHLY done. Why are the sleds blurred? They're in the same harness with the dogs and almost on the same plane as the dogs. They should also be in some focus, but no... They're also blurred, like the fence and the snow, but for some reason the people on the right are just wildly blurred. Nothing but inconsistencies and contradictions. How do you rate this work as professional? Because there's "PRO" next to the author's nickname???
Andrey Ivanov, Evochka, he didn't expect such a serious analysis of my joke (Jewish humor isn't always straightforward), of course, because of the "PRO"... However, many authors were absolutely delighted by the photo, and they, too, need food and joy...
Boris Gurevich, what other image??? If it had deep meaning, a complex presentation, and a mile-long description of the work, then yes... But what's this???))) Everything is done so CLOSELY. Why are the sleds blurred??? They're in the same harness with the dogs and almost on the same plane as the dogs. They should also be somewhat sharp, but no... They're also blurred, like the fence and snow, but for some reason the people on the right are just wildly blurred. Nothing but inconsistencies and contradictions. How do you rate this work as professional? Because "PRO" is written next to the author's nickname???
Andrey Ivanov, Now I see that it wasn't Eva who wrote this, and I unfairly offended the sweet woman, but the essence of the answer is the same.
kids.
Make tkemali or satsebeli.
It's heavenly. You need Georgian cherry plums, only the original kind.
It seems he's a new rising star at Photocenters, a searching author who's not afraid of bold experiments. He has a couple of good portraits in his portfolio, but his technique is still weak.
At all.
You can't cast them out!!
An exorcism has been requested! With rare exceptions, and even then...I don't know of any examples (for the good).
Really.
Boris Gurevich, but who else??? If it had deep meaning, a complex presentation, and a mile-long description of the work, then yes... But what about this???)))
Everything is very CRUELLY done. Why are the sleds blurred??? They're in the same harness with the dogs and almost on the same plane as the dogs. They should also be in some focus, but no... They're also blurred, like the fence and the snow, but for some reason the people on the right are just wildly blurred. Nothing but inconsistencies and contradictions. How do you rate this work as professional? Because there's "PRO" next to the author's nickname???