Wow, just yesterday I was shooting a still life with vegetables (using whatever I had at home), and then Kryshen showed up with it, and with flowers too! But seriously (let the adherents of "immortal art" be indignant) – I really liked it, Sergey!
Wow, just yesterday I was shooting a still life with vegetables (using what I had at home), and here Kryshen has done it, and with flowers too! But seriously (let the adherents of "immortal art" be indignant) - I really liked it, Sergey!
Vakhtang Bartaia, Thank you, Vakhtang. Of all the things we have at home, I only had to "borrow" a bunch of elderberries from the neighbors. I don't know if elderberries grow in your Urals, but they're perfect for a still life.
Vakhtang Bartaia, Thank you, Vakhtang. The only thing I have growing at home is a bunch of elderberries I had to "borrow" from the neighbors. I don't know if elderberries grow in your Urals, but they're perfect for a still life.
Sergey Kryshen, Actually, they do, but I haven't noticed any in our area. I'm having a hard time getting around to photographing a still life (for various reasons), but as a genre, it's interesting to me. I'm saving yours for my archive. And don't mind!
The little Dutchmen are crying with envy, there's elderberry in the garden..., I skimmed the title and thought it was "Still Life with Nonsense"
Viktor Kirillov, Thanks, Victor, I liked "Icarus" too. I read "Icarus" in one author's title, and thought it was about a bus, but no, that's the name of a person...
Viktor Kirillov, Thanks, Victor, I liked "Ikarus" too. I read "Ikarus" in one author's title and thought it was a bus, but no, that's a person's name...
Sergey Kryshen, Well, that's it now, the OVIR people are defeated and disgraced, we can now create beautiful things in peace.
Ratoncito Jerry, I rarely shoot still lifes, although the process itself is very engaging. This one was shot with minimalist settings, minimal props, vegetables from the garden, and street light...)))
Ratoncito Jerry, I rarely shoot still lifes, although the process itself is very engaging. This one was shot with minimalist props, vegetables from the garden and street light...)))
Sergey Kryshen, I understand perfectly well that for me, this is no longer just photography. It's something akin to painting. But my artistic abilities don't allow me to do that. I only came up with photo compositions for competitions on photonomy.ru. I've posted some here, particularly with eggs and others. I always look at still lifes with interest. I especially like Tatulyan here. She clearly has a solid artistic education. And she has a high-level grasp of the theory of composition.
Sergey Kryshen, I understand perfectly well that for me, it's no longer just or even primarily photography. It's something akin to painting. But my artistic abilities don't allow me to do that. I only created photo compositions for competitions on photonomy.ru. I've posted some here, particularly with eggs and other things. I always look at still lifes with interest. I especially like Tatulyan here. She clearly has a solid artistic education. And she has a high-level grasp of construction theory.
Ratoncito Jerry, It's a shame she's rarely featured here; I really like her work too. She has a good command of light, color, and composition. I look at her work quite often. There are other artists worthy of attention, but (again, a shame) they haven't appeared here for a long time.
Sergey Kryshen, I understand perfectly well that for me, it's no longer just or even primarily photography. It's something akin to painting. But my artistic abilities don't allow me to pursue that. I only created photo compositions for competitions on photonomy.ru. I've posted some here, particularly with eggs and other things. I always look at still lifes with interest. I especially like Tatulyan here. She clearly has a solid artistic education. And she has a high-level grasp of construction theory.
Ratoncito Jerry, I miss Photonomy. There was a theme, and each author developed it as best they could. The end result, with an average of hundreds of photos within each theme, was interesting. Still life is a genre in which, to achieve consistently good results, you need knowledge, time, conditions, props, and, of course, a gifted vision. I only have enough for a few photos a year...))) And I could talk about Tatulyan and her still lifes for a long time, because she's a pro at this and there's something to see.
Viktor Kirillov, your creative OV already makes me want to puke.
Ratoncito Jerry, Puke to your heart's content. Krasnoperov's still lifes here sometimes turn out quite well, very stylish and laconic. Petrov-Vodkin's entire still life is OV-esque. Do you have something against it, or do you only like rich, baroque, Dutch-style work?
Ratoncito Jerry, Vomit to your health, Krasnoperov's still lifes sometimes turn out quite well here, very stylish and laconic. Petrov-Vodkin's entire still life is OVish. Do you have something against it, or do you only like rich, baroque, Dutch-style paintings?
Viktor Kirillov, Yes, exactly. I only recognize academic painting. And German painting in particular.
A still life, like any other genre, can be "country" or "OVish," and in between are Tatulyan and his "secondary classics."
Viktor Kirillov, I've become interested in your work since a certain point, probably this year, Viktor. Previously, I had a somewhat simplistic view of your work; your trolling got in the way. So here's the question: are you a pure OVish person, or is there something else mixed in? You don't have to answer the question if you prefer. P.S. Most OVish still life photographers combine both OV and classical still life photography. That's a fact.
Viktor Kirillov, yes, that's right. I only recognize academic painting. And German in particular, too.
Ratoncito Jerry, Acknowledge what you want, Petrov-Vodkin is in world-famous museums, and "academician" Shilov is in the estates of new Russians on rugs with swans.
Ratoncito Jerry, Admit what you will, Petrov-Vodkin is in world museums, and "academician" Shilov is in the estates of new Russians on rugs with swans.
Viktor Kirillov, the presence of an object in a museum is simply a museum exhibit. You asked, I answered. I didn't write about my tastes. It's your prerogative to announce your loves on every street corner.
[quote]Viktor Kirillov, I've become interested in your work since a certain point, probably this year, Viktor. Previously, I was somewhat simplistic about your work, your trolling got in the way. So here's the question: are you a pure OVIS-er, or is there something else at play?
Sergey Kryshen, This is a pointless argument about terminology. I already wrote in my resume that I'm not a fanatical amateur photographer; I shoot based on my mood and opportunity. This is my way of not degenerating and becoming dumbed down by "professional work." I'm a small-time school kid, 20x30 vignettes.
Viktor Kirillov, I've become interested in your work since a certain point, probably this year, Viktor. Previously, I was somewhat simplistic about your work, your trolling got in the way. So here's the question: are you a pure OVIS-er, or is there something else mixed in with you?
Sergey Kryshen, An empty argument about terminology. I already wrote in my resume that I'm not a fanatical amateur photographer; I shoot according to my mood and opportunity. This is my way of not degenerating and becoming dumbed down by "professional work." I'm a small-time school tycoon, 20x30 vignettes.
Viktor Kirillov, There's no argument about terminology, I'm perfectly happy with "shooting according to my mood and opportunity," at least without any hint of belonging to the celestial caste.
Sergey Kryshen, I understand perfectly well that for me, it's no longer just or even primarily photography. It's something akin to painting. But my artistic abilities don't allow me to pursue that. I only created photo compositions for competitions on photonomy.ru. I've posted some here, particularly with eggs and other things. I always look at still lifes with interest. I especially like Tatulyan here. She clearly has a solid artistic education. And her grasp of construction theory is top-notch. Ratoncito Jerry, I miss Photonomy. There was a theme, and each author developed it as best they could. The end result, with an average of hundreds of photos within each theme, was interesting. Still life is a genre in which, to achieve consistently good results, you need knowledge, time, conditions, props, and, of course, a gifted vision. I only manage a few photos a year...))) And I could talk about Tatulyan and her still lifes for a long time, because she's a pro at this and there's a lot to see.
Sergey Kryshen, I agree. And she has it all, in my opinion.
Well, that's it now, the OVIR people are defeated and disgraced, we can now create beautiful things in peace.
I always look at still lifes with interest. I especially like Tatulyan here. She clearly has a solid artistic education. And she has a high-level grasp of the theory of composition.
Puke to your heart's content. Krasnoperov's still lifes here sometimes turn out quite well, very stylish and laconic. Petrov-Vodkin's entire still life is OV-esque. Do you have something against it, or do you only like rich, baroque, Dutch-style work?
P.S. Most OVish still life photographers combine both OV and classical still life photography. That's a fact.
Acknowledge what you want, Petrov-Vodkin is in world-famous museums, and "academician" Shilov is in the estates of new Russians on rugs with swans.
You asked, I answered. I didn't write about my tastes. It's your prerogative to announce your loves on every street corner.
Sergey Kryshen,
This is a pointless argument about terminology. I already wrote in my resume that I'm not a fanatical amateur photographer; I shoot based on my mood and opportunity. This is my way of not degenerating and becoming dumbed down by "professional work." I'm a small-time school kid, 20x30 vignettes.