Well, I don’t know, some kind of Rubens with folds on her belly, although the model doesn’t seem fat (well, you know whose garden this stone is aimed at)
[quote]Viktor Kirillov, Yes, even Rubens. You can't always photograph slender women.
Victor Semashkevich, No, she's not fat at all, and all those folds on her belly are the result of an unphotogenic POSE. I was hinting at the photographer's criticism; that's your fault. I'm sure she wouldn't object to a more elegant "composition."
Viktor Kirillov, Even Rubens. You can't always photograph slender women.
Victor Semashkevich, No, she's not fat at all, and all those folds on her belly are the result of an unphotogenic POSE. I was hinting at the photographer's pebble; that's your fault. I'm sure she wouldn't object to a more elegant "composition."
Viktor Kirillov, I get it about the pebble. That would change her figure significantly. I don't like that.
Then your figure will change dramatically. I don't like that.
[b]Victor Semashkevich, Yes, it will change, it will become more refined and elegant, but you don't like that?? I have nothing against plus-size women and their photographs, even older ones, but that's a completely different genre.
Victor Semashkevich, Yes, she will change, she will become more refined and elegant, but you don't like that?? I have nothing against plus-size women and their photos, even older ones, but it's a completely different genre.
Victor Kirillov, in this case, it's normal. There will be more photos of this model - you'll understand.
Victor Semashkevich, unsightly folds of skin that formed because she first placed her hand on the armrest and then leaned forward a bit (and thereby shifted the skin on her arm). If she had first leaned into the correct position and then placed her hand, this fold would not have appeared.
Victor Semashkevich, unsightly folds of skin that formed because she first placed her hand on the armrest and then leaned forward a bit (which shifted the skin on her arm). If she had leaned into the correct position first and then placed her hand on the armrest, this fold wouldn't have appeared.
M Y X O M O P, I saw them, but I didn't remove them. I don't consider these folds flawed. They add a natural look. There are many other folds that need to be touched up.
... There are many other folds that need to be retouched
Victor Semashkevich, I'm not talking about retouching, but about noticing them before shooting and physically correcting them (all you had to do was raise and lower that arm so those folds simply wouldn't be there) - it's also easier than retouching them later.
Victor Semashkevich, I'm not talking about retouching, but about noticing it before the shoot and physically correcting it (all you had to do was raise and lower that arm so those folds wouldn't appear) – it's also easier than retouching it later.
M Y X O M O P, You're right, but I haven't reached that level of awesomeness yet☝️
Victor Semashkevich,
No, she's not fat at all, and all those folds on her belly are the result of an unphotogenic POSE. I was hinting at the photographer's criticism; that's your fault. I'm sure she wouldn't object to a more elegant "composition."
Yes, it will change, it will become more refined and elegant, but you don't like that?? I have nothing against plus-size women and their photographs, even older ones, but that's a completely different genre.
Well, for YOU, of course, the rivers of ZhRyzhov are much more authoritative.
M Y X O M O P, You're right, but I haven't reached that level of awesomeness yet☝️