***
film 120
Photo by Ivan Palis, photographer. Classic portraits: 6x6, portrait. Published 04.12.2012.
Comments 12
Reggi 0.00
04.12.2012 09:53
No. I don't know what it's for.
04.12.2012 09:56
In my humble opinion, the "photographer's ears" are unnecessary here. They already darken the dark left side of the frame, thereby further "impoverishing" the right side.
This is all purely in my humble opinion.
Ivan Palis
Ivan PalisPRO 110.16
04.12.2012 10:35
No. I don't know what that's for.
Reggi, you don't have to bother writing such "super-meaningful" comments, or are you a troll?
Ivan Palis
Ivan PalisPRO 110.16
04.12.2012 10:35
IMO, the "photographer's ears" are unnecessary here. They already darken the dark left side of the frame, thereby further "pooring" the right side.
This is all purely my opinion
alexnik, thanks for your opinion.
Reggi 0.00
04.12.2012 11:05
Reggie, can you please stop bothering with such "super-informative" comments? Or are you a troll?
Of course I can. But you'll just keep posting photos about nothing. And that's sad. Because looking at the execution technique, everything could be completely different. Don't you feel bad about wasting time producing such photos???
Vetal Korolev
04.12.2012 11:14
Ivan Palis, self-portrait within a portrait,
Karimar
Karimar 4.80
04.12.2012 11:37
Maybe it's the ears that are the focus, but this 50/50 split of the frame option worked out well for me.
Ivan Palis
Ivan PalisPRO 110.16
04.12.2012 12:54
Reggi, can you please stop bothering with such "super-informative" comments? Or are you a troll?
Of course I can. But you'll just keep posting photos about nothing. And that's sad. Because looking at the technique, things could be completely different. Don't you mind wasting time producing such photos???
Reggi, spend the time you wasted on me on yourself, because your photos are completely unimpressive.

Goodbye! I won't respond to you anymore, because you're not providing any specifics or constructive insights. It's pure trolling, and a troll needs to be hungry.
Reggi 0.00
04.12.2012 12:58
Reggie, spend the time you wasted on me on yourself, because you're not impressive at all in photos.
Goodbye! I won't respond to you anymore, because you're not providing any specifics or constructive feedback, just trolling, and a troll needs to be hungry. ;) I know what I'm talking about.
It's a shame. With some work on yourself, careful reading, and considering the recommendations, you could have turned out great. It's truly a shame.
Ivan Palis
Ivan PalisPRO 110.16
04.12.2012 13:01
Reggi, spend the time you wasted on me on yourself, because you're not impressive at all in photos.
Goodbye! I won't respond to you anymore, because you're not providing any specifics or constructive feedback, just pure trolling, and a troll needs to be hungry. ;) I know what I'm talking about.
It's a shame. With some work on yourself, careful reading, and understanding the recommendations, you could have turned out great. I'm truly sorry. :(
Reggi, shove your pity somewhere deep, I don't need it.
Reggi 0.00
04.12.2012 13:04
Oh, and one more thing... The reply comment looks really petty and nasty :(
Good luck
Ivan Palis
Ivan PalisPRO 110.16
04.12.2012 13:59
Yes, and one more thing... The response comment looks very petty and nasty :(
Good luck
Reggi, bye, criticism!