For some reason, this kind of work isn't highly recommended here, although you and hundreds, maybe even thousands, of colleagues have many very good photos. More nature and people, the genre is actively explored. I see a wonderful, high-quality work, although it's zero, and yet it's been up for over an hour... I have the same picture... I recommend it with a 10! Come on in.
For some reason, this kind of work is poorly recommended here.
Let me clarify for everyone: in four years of being on the site, the author has recommended thirty-one of his colleagues' work. His colleagues respond in kind. And that's right, because if the author came to the site with the motto "check out my photo while I go for a walk," then you can hardly expect anything different. There are no scheduled evaluators here. You either communicate with colleagues through recommendations, ratings, comments, or you just wander off somewhere far, far away.
Let me clarify for everyone: in the four years he's been on the site, the author has recommended thirty-one colleagues' work. His colleagues respond in kind. And that's a good thing, because if an author came to the site with the motto, "Check out my photo while I go for a walk," then you're unlikely to see anything different. There are no scheduled raters here. You either communicate with colleagues through recommendations, ratings, comments, or you're just wandering around somewhere far, far away.
Oleg Kaledin, Thanks for the statistics. Maybe you can advise me on when, where, and who to photograph? I'll definitely ask next time. Happy shooting.
For some reason, this kind of work isn't highly recommended here, although you and hundreds, maybe even thousands, of colleagues have many very good photos. More nature and people, the genre is actively explored. I see wonderful, high-quality work, although it's zero, and yet it's been up for over an hour... I have the same picture... I recommend it with a 10! Come on in.
Alex M., There are a lot of good works here, but the honey plant rule is basically... you give me a run for my money. So it's better to skip to 35 photos.
Can you advise me when and where to photograph whom?
Sergey Bukharev, I didn't give you any advice whatsoever. Don't distort what I wrote. That's the first thing. Second, the "you-return-me-to-you" phenomenon, which you called honey plants, was created by people like you. You treated your colleagues' work with disdain. That's what killed the site. Because in response to your ignoring, people reciprocated with attention. And third, in the 35 photos, honey plants are even better than ours. At least here, people communicate.
you and hundreds, maybe even thousands, of colleagues have many very good photos.
More nature and people, the genre is actively explored.
I see a wonderful, high-quality work, although it's zero, and yet
it's been up for over an hour...
I have the same picture...
I recommend it with a 10! Come on in.
Thanks for the statistics. Maybe you can advise me on when, where, and who to photograph? I'll definitely ask next time. Happy shooting.
There are a lot of good works here, but the honey plant rule is basically... you give me a run for my money. So it's better to skip to 35 photos.
Second, the "you-return-me-to-you" phenomenon, which you called honey plants, was created by people like you. You treated your colleagues' work with disdain. That's what killed the site. Because in response to your ignoring, people reciprocated with attention.
And third, in the 35 photos, honey plants are even better than ours. At least here, people communicate.