A high-quality image—tonality, detail, framing, artificial lighting, I understand—was also present. On the other hand, it's just a bug (I have no idea what it's called), sitting on a flower. In my opinion, it's too static; I'd like some movement, a plot, and if it's static, then some unusual details that can't be seen with the naked eye. You have much better work, which makes this photo look rather dull. Good luck!
A high-quality image—tonality, detail, framing, artificial lighting, as I understand it—was also involved. On the other hand, it's just a bug (I have no idea what it's called), just sitting on a flower. In my opinion, it's too static; I'd like some dynamics, a plot, and if it's static, then some unusual details that can't be seen with the naked eye. You have much better work, compared to which this photo looks boring.
Good luck!
Ovis, like everyone else, there are successful and less successful works! I really love this work! I disagree with you about the lighting! This work was taken outdoors and in natural light! It's a shame you found the photo boring!
On the other hand, it's just a bug (I have no idea what it's called), sitting on a flower. In my opinion, it's too static; I'd like some movement, a plot, and if it's static, then some unusual details that can't be seen with the naked eye. You have much better work, which makes this photo look rather dull.
Good luck!
I think that's the most important thing!
Good luck!
WORDSLESS!!!