Viktor Moroz, I'd say it looks like an extended exposure, that's clear, you can even see it, and therefore the result of this exposure, coupled with this saturation, resembles a watercolor. And based on the above, I won't ask the question "Have you ever painted with watercolors?"
Viktor Moroz, I'd say it looks like an elongated one, that's clear, you can even see it, and therefore the result of this exposure, coupled with this saturation, is reminiscent of a watercolor. And based on the above, I won't ask the question "Have you ever painted with watercolors?"
Viktor Moroz, I'd say it looks like an elongated one, that's clear, you can even see it, and therefore the result of this exposure, coupled with this saturation, resembles a watercolor. And based on the above, I won't ask the question "Have you ever painted with watercolors?"
Yu R A, Yura, thank you for your attention! I had to do it in "art school," there they only used gouache and watercolors...I don't mind your definition.
Yu R A, Yura, thank you for your attention! I had to do this in the "art school," where they only had gouache and watercolors...I'm not against your definition, after all.
Viktor Moroz, hmm? The word "against" is used twice. If there's a missing period after the first one, then it means you're against it, but if there isn't, but without the dash, then it's like a rap, which reinforces your agreement with my definition. It's a riddle))) Okay, we'll settle on the second option 😆
Viktor Moroz, hmmm? The word "against" is used twice. If there's a missing period after the first, it means "against," but if there isn't, but without the dash, it's like a rap, which reinforces agreement with my definition. Riddle))) Okay, we'll settle on the second option😆
Thank you, Valentin!
I had to do it in "art school," there they only used gouache and watercolors...I don't mind your definition.
Okay, we'll settle on the second option 😆
Thank you, Yuri!
Thank you, Yuri!