I don't know, I don't know... I prefer looking at distinct, smooth tonal transitions than the process of peering into a picture trying to see details.
10.12.2007 10:46
Vovik, why is it always so dark for you? Maybe it's a creative technique, but in my opinion it's a flaw, a technical flaw. The theme is covered, the lighting seems fine, the pose is fine, but damn, you can't see a thing. Is this really beautiful?
Look at this - this is yours:
http://i009.radikal.ru/0712/25/e87e6ee3a350t.jpg And this is with the curved line applied. Yes, there's posterization and jagged halftones - but that's loss due to processing and compression. A properly exposed photo won't have it.
Cool! I'm a nerd I think if they got rid of the halos (at the edge of the pier), which sneakily reveal the touch of Photoshop, the work would benefit even more.
http://i034.radikal.ru/0712/fa/4a069e21ebe4t.jpg
Look at this - this is yours:
http://i009.radikal.ru/0712/25/e87e6ee3a350t.jpg
And this is with the curved line applied. Yes, there's posterization and jagged halftones - but that's loss due to processing and compression. A properly exposed photo won't have it.
http://i048.radikal.ru/0712/a3/ee970972296at.jpg
Vovik, you can't live on honey plants alone. Read up on exposure and the histogram.